For femaless (get a hold of Dining table dos), both most depicted mature connection appearances had been safe attachment (31%; letter = 26) and afraid-avoidant connection (twenty-eight.6%; n = 24), while for males, by far the most depicted mature accessory appearance was in fact secure (38.5%; letter = 20) and you may dismissing (thirty-six.5%; n = 19). It is essential to emphasize that preoccupied accessory layout are badly portrayed in the boys (step 3.8%; n = 2), symbolizing 14.3% of our attempt (Letter = 12).
An initial MANOVA, using the Wilk’s test (Rao’s approximation), was performed with the raw scores of the attachment (adult attachment style-secure, dismissing, anxious-preoccupied, and fearful-avoidant) as the dependent variables and with gender, education, and current family situation, as well as their interactions, as the explanatory variables. Education [F(4, 118) = 3.236, p = 0.015], current family situation [F(sixteen, 321) = 1.704, p = 0.045), and the interaction between gender and education [F(several, 271) = 2.115, p = 0.016] were found to significantly influence the attachment scores for participants.
Some you to definitely-method ANOVAs was basically completed to observe the matchmaking between the built variable intense many the latest connection looks as well as the explanatory parameters away from education and you can current members of the family situation, as well as the telecommunications between them jak uÅ¼ywaÄ‡ pink cupid. If you are nothing ones Aeters were seen to be high. The outcome reveal, such as, that members who had a twelfth grade education was in fact of this a reduced amount of stressed-obsessed connection layout, and is in the a growth whilst interacts which have all of the household members issues, in addition to ideal raise try used in those people which have an excellent highschool studies and generally are hitched.
The significant associations between attachment styles were examined further by non-parametric testing (i.e., Kruskal–Wallis test) using a Monte Carlo method with 10,000 simulations and p < 0.05. The findings revealed several significant relationships between attachment scores (K = , p < 0.0001). The Steel–Dwass–Critchlow-Fligner procedure for multiple comparisons revealed that scores for the anxious-preoccupied attachment style were significantly different from the other attachment styles (see Figure 1).
Taken along with her, on the intense scores into the adult connection appearance, the new raw ratings getting anxious-preoccupied attachment appearances mostly change from men and women on almost every other attachment appearances. A following data try for this reason programmed to determine and therefore of the explanatory variables, or no, affected these intense ratings on the stressed-obsessed connection looks.
An ANOVA was therefore performed to determine the relationship between the explanatory variables of gender, education, and current family situation and the anxious-preoccupied attachment scores. The overall model was significant [F(8, 122) = 2.193, p = 0.032], and only gender was found to significantly influence anxious-preoccupied attachment scores [F(step one, 129) = 6.176, p = 0.014]. The post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test indicated that the mean score for females (Mfemale = 3.325, SD = 0.374) was significantly different from the mean score for males (Mmale = 2.625, SD = 0.363). Taken together, these results indicate that women have higher levels of anxious-preoccupied scores for attachment compared with men.
Study of Organization Ranging from Impaired Habits, Accessory Styles, and you can Demographic Variables
While the revealed from inside the Table step 3, the preferred impaired routines adopted was communication (Letter = 102), followed closely by giving question (N = 37) and controlling practices (letter = 25). Within this low-systematic take to, most other more severe impaired habits included 7 dangers, about three injuries, you to definitely property wreck, without hostility.
Scared and you can obsessed players was indeed found to be overrepresented for telecommunications and you will defamation, correspondingly. A total of 91.2% (Letter = 31) out of afraid people utilized communication as his or her impaired behavior [? ( 3 ) 2 = eight.98, p = 0.046, V = 0.25], if you find yourself 30% (Letter = 5) off preoccupied people made use of defamation because their impaired conclusion [? ( step 3 ) dos = six.25, p = 0.019, V = 0.22]. From trying assist, possessed professionals seem to be more prone to find elite group assist, while you are not one of one’s dismissing players proclaimed to ask getting assist [? ( step 3 ) dos = 8.21, p = 0.042, V = 0.28].